TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Defects-free single-crystalline zinc oxide nanostructures for efficient photoelectrochemical solar hydrogen generation” [Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45(51), (2020) 27279-27290, (S036031992032718X), (10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.138)]
AU - Nandanapalli, Koteeswara Reddy
AU - Mudusu, Devika
AU - Lee, Sungwon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
PY - 2025/3/14
Y1 - 2025/3/14
N2 - The copyright permission statements for the reproduction of images from Ref. [1] were missing in Fig. 2 of the published article. The necessary permissions have been obtained, and the updated figure captions, now including the correct copyright permission statements and citations, are provided below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused. Fig. 2. Morphology and crystal structure of pristine and surface passivated ZnO nanostructures: (a, b) FESEM images (cross-sectional and top view) of ZnO nanostructures passivated with 100 cycles of Zn–O atoms. (c) FESEM image of single ZnO nanorods collected from pristine, 100, 200, and 300 cycles of Zn–O deposited structures (not in scale) and linear increase of the average diameter of ZnO nanorods as a function of the number of ALD cycles (NCs). (d, e) Low (insets show high) magnification TEM images of pristine and 200 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods. (f) XRD profiles of pristine and 300 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods (y-axis is in log scale) and (g) Elaborated preferential XRD peak of pristine and surface passivated ZnO nanostructures. (h, i) HRTEM images (insets show SAED images) of pristine and 200 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods. Adapted with permission from Ref. [1].
AB - The copyright permission statements for the reproduction of images from Ref. [1] were missing in Fig. 2 of the published article. The necessary permissions have been obtained, and the updated figure captions, now including the correct copyright permission statements and citations, are provided below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused. Fig. 2. Morphology and crystal structure of pristine and surface passivated ZnO nanostructures: (a, b) FESEM images (cross-sectional and top view) of ZnO nanostructures passivated with 100 cycles of Zn–O atoms. (c) FESEM image of single ZnO nanorods collected from pristine, 100, 200, and 300 cycles of Zn–O deposited structures (not in scale) and linear increase of the average diameter of ZnO nanorods as a function of the number of ALD cycles (NCs). (d, e) Low (insets show high) magnification TEM images of pristine and 200 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods. (f) XRD profiles of pristine and 300 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods (y-axis is in log scale) and (g) Elaborated preferential XRD peak of pristine and surface passivated ZnO nanostructures. (h, i) HRTEM images (insets show SAED images) of pristine and 200 cycles passivated ZnO nanorods. Adapted with permission from Ref. [1].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217441804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.369
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.369
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85217441804
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 109
SP - 241
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
ER -