Corrigendum to “A novel supportive assessment for comprehensive aggression using EEG and ECG” (Neuroscience Letters (2019) 694 (136–142), (S0304394018308504) (10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.005))

The authors regret for the request to correct some typos, errors and minor changes as summarized in the <Correction Table Summary>. Among the corrections, they consider the replacement of the Figure 3 a major change. The Figure 3 in the manuscript had been changed like other tables and figures during the revision process, but we accidently put the old version instead of the revised version. We discovered our mistake after our paper was published. 1) The (A) “By verbal argument” of the following side-by-side figure, ‘PA’ at the α/Fp2 section was replaced with ‘VA’. ‘VA’ is the aggression subtrait related to the alpha signal from the Fp2 channel.2) The (B) “By peer conflict” of the following side-by-side figure, ‘PA’ at the β/F8 section was replaced with ‘VA’. ‘VA’ is the aggression subtrait related to the beta signal from the F8 channel.The revision was made to reflect one of our key data from Table 3. In the Table 3, the α signal from the Fp2 channel upon Scene 1 stimuli showed the correlation coefficients value (−.283**) with the verbal aggression point of BPAQ self-reports. Likewise, the β signal from the F8 channel upon Scene 2 stimuli showed the correlation coefficients value (−.222*) with the verbal aggression point of BPAQ self-reports. However, the revised figure did not affect our results, discussion and overall conclusions since both values had low statistical significance (*p < 0.05). <Correction Table Summary> [Table presented] < Major change in the figure > [Figure presented] Also, other changes in the summary table did not affect the main contents of our manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.