Comparison of the magnetic ordering in Sr2Yb1Ru 0.9Cu0.1O6 and Ru1Sr 2Gd1Cu2O8 superconductors

D. Ahmad, G. C. Kim, Rock Kil Ko, Yong Seung Kwon, Y. C. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ru1Sr2Gd1Cu2O8 and Sr2Yb1Ru0.9Cu0.1O6 were synthesized using a solid-state reaction. X-ray diffraction showed that Ru 1Sr2Gd1Cu2O8 crystallized into the tetragonal Ru-1212 structure (space group P4/mmm), whereas the Sr 2Yb1Ru0.9Cu0.1O6 had a monoclynic structure (space group P21/n). Sr2Yb 1Ru0.9Cu0.1O6 showed a possible magnetic transition (T m a g ) at 44 K with a superconducting transition temperature T c at 30 K. In contrast, Ru 1Sr2Gd1Cu2O8 showed a magnetic transition at 140 K with a T c at 25 K. The magnetization data for Sr2Yb1Ru0.9Cu0.1O 6 suggests that this sample exhibits antiferromagnetic ordering in zero-field-cooled (ZFC) magnetization, whereas it reveals a weak ferromagnetic component during field-cooled (FC) cycles. In addition, larger diamagnetic signals were observed during FC cycle compared to the ZFC. These results suggest that the valence state of the Yb ion have a significant effect on the magnetic state of the Sr2Yb1Ru0.9Cu0.1O 6 superconductor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1807-1812
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was supported for 2 years by a Pusan National University research grant.

Keywords

  • Ruthenates
  • Ruthenocuprate
  • Superconductivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the magnetic ordering in Sr2Yb1Ru 0.9Cu0.1O6 and Ru1Sr 2Gd1Cu2O8 superconductors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this