Brillouin light scattering study of the magnetic anisotropy in bcc-Fe(100) ultrathin films grown on GaAs(100) surfaces with different reconstructions

  • Seung Seok Ha
  • , Nam Hee Kim
  • , Chun Yeol You
  • , Sukmock Lee
  • , Kenta Ohta
  • , Takuto Maruyama
  • , Katsunori Konishi
  • , Takayuki Nozaki
  • , Yoshishige Suzuki
  • , Willem Van Roy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We investigated the magnetic anisotropy of ultrathin bcc-Fe (001) films with a fcc-Au(001) cover layer, grown onto GaAs (001) (4 × 1) and (2 × 6)/(3 × 6) reconstructed surfaces. The magneto-optical Kerr effect hysteresis loops revealed existence of a strong in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in the Fe films grown on both the surfaces. Details of the in-plane uniaxial anisotropy (KU), cubic anisotropy (KC), and effective demagnetization field (47πMeff ) were studied by Brillouin light scattering method. We observed a stronger reduction of K U, KC , and 4πMeff in thinner Fe layers (below 1.3 nm) grown on both the surfaces. In the case of Fe films grown on GaAs (4 × 1) surface, anisotropies observed were smaller than that for the (2 × 6)/(3 × 6) surface. This reflects the role of surface structure in determining the magnetic anisotropies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4957701
Pages (from-to)2527-2530
Number of pages4
JournalIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work is partially supported by KOSEF (Basic Research Program No. R01-2007-000-20281-0). We acknowledge Mr. S. Degroote and Mr. W. van de Graaf of IMEC for preparation of the GaAs layers and Dr. Ashwin A. Tulapurkar for valuable discussions.

Keywords

  • Brillouin light scattering
  • GaAs reconstruction
  • Magnetic anisotropy
  • Spin waves

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brillouin light scattering study of the magnetic anisotropy in bcc-Fe(100) ultrathin films grown on GaAs(100) surfaces with different reconstructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this