Abstract
Relaxation oscillators have a profound scope as on-chip reference clock sources or sensor front-ends in comparison to ring oscillators due to their superior frequency stability, control linearity, and wide tuning range. However, despite a better fundamental limit predicted in theory, the phase noise performance of relaxation oscillators trails behind that of ring oscillators. Furthermore, there is a huge gap between the maximum achievable 1/f2 phase noise FOM (169dBc/Hz) [1] and those achieved by recently proposed low-power relaxation oscillator implementations [1-4].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2016 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2016 |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| Pages | 106-108 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781467394666 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 23 Feb 2016 |
| Event | 63rd IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2016 - San Francisco, United States Duration: 31 Jan 2016 → 4 Feb 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference |
|---|---|
| Volume | 59 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0193-6530 |
Conference
| Conference | 63rd IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2016 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | San Francisco |
| Period | 31/01/16 → 4/02/16 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 IEEE.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A 1.4V 10.5MHz swing-boosted differential relaxation oscillator with 162.1dBc/Hz FOM and 9.86psrms period jitter in 0.18µm CMOS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver